- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 5900i SFA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
International 5900i SFA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
6 reasons to buy Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 8711.2 mm | 17 % less or 1511.2 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 6900 mm and 8534.4 mm | 19 % less or 1634.4 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Full power | 357.9 kW and 316.9 kW | 11 % more or 41.0 kW |
| Peak torque | 2400 Nm and 2237.1 Nm | 7 % more or 162.9 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 12 and 10 | 17 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Wheelbase | 4267.2 mm and 4100 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 863.6 mm and 825 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5892.8 mm and 6285 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23745.6 kg and 23400 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 6377.5 kg and 7780 kg |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 4165.6 mm and 3900 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5791.2 mm and 6085 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 863.6 mm and 825 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23745.6 kg and 23400 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 6373 kg and 7690 kg |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 8 and 8 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Volvo |
| Model | ISM (425 HP) and D13A480 (480 HP) |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Eaton Fuller and Volvo |
| Model | FR-13210B 10-speeds and V2514 |
Images