- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 5900i SFA 6x4 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
International 5900i SFA 6x4 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
1 reasons to buy International 5900i SFA 6x4 (2004):
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 13 and 12 | 8 % more or 1 |
4 reasons to buy Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 10567.4 mm | 32 % less or 3367.4 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 6900 mm and 9777.9 mm | 29 % less or 2877.9 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 357.9 kW and 238.6 kW | 33 % more or 119.3 kW |
| Peak torque | 2400 Nm and 1559.2 Nm | 35 % more or 840.8 Nm |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Dimensional length | 7467.6 mm and 6285 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1371.6 mm and 825 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23745.6 kg and 23400 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 6933.2 kg and 7780 kg |
| Wheelbase | 5334 mm and 4100 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 4876.8 mm and 3900 mm |
| Dimensional length | 7010.4 mm and 6085 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1371.6 mm and 825 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23745.6 kg and 23400 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 6888.3 kg and 7690 kg |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 2 |
| Class by weight | 8 and 8 |
Motor
| Model | ISM (425 HP) and D13A480 (480 HP) |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Volvo |
Gear box
| Model | FR-13210B 10-speeds and V2514 |
| Manufacturer | Eaton Fuller and Volvo |
Images