- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 5900i SFA 6x4 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
International 5900i SFA 6x4 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
1 reasons to buy International 5900i SFA 6x4 (2004):
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 13 and 12 | 8 % more or 1 |
4 reasons to buy Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7450 mm and 10567.4 mm | 30 % less or 3117.4 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 9777.9 mm | 26 % less or 2577.9 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 410.1 kW and 238.6 kW | 42 % more or 171.5 kW |
| Peak torque | 2800 Nm and 1559.2 Nm | 44 % more or 1240.8 Nm |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Wheelbase | 5334 mm and 3200 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23745.6 kg and 26000 kg |
| Dimensional length | 7467.6 mm and 6735 mm |
| Chassis total weight | 6933.2 kg and 8580 kg |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1371.6 mm and 805 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 4876.8 mm and 3050 mm |
| Dimensional length | 7010.4 mm and 6585 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1371.6 mm and 805 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23745.6 kg and 26000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 6888.3 kg and 8570 kg |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 2 |
| Class by weight | 8 and 8 |
Motor
| Model | ISX (560 HP) and D16C (610 HP) |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Volvo |
Gear box
| Model | FR-13210B 13-speeds and VO2814 |
| Manufacturer | Eaton Fuller and Volvo |
Images