- Home/
- Comparison/
- Square Baler/
- Case IH RB554 vs. Challenger RB463A Auto Looping
Case IH RB554 vs. Challenger RB463A Auto Looping
5 reasons to buy Case IH RB554:
Press size
Bale width | 1548.4 mm and 1182 mm | 24 % more or 366.4 mm |
Bale minimum weight | 226.8 kg and 745.7 kg | 70 % less or 518.9 kg |
Compression chamber
Belts number | 8 and 6 Laced, wedge clamp | 25 % more or 2 |
Baler
Tines number | 144 and 96 | 33 % more or 48 |
Number of rods | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
5 reasons to buy Challenger RB463A Auto Looping:
Sizes
Tractor mechanism required power of PTO | 48.5 kW and 52.2 kW | 7 % less or 3.7 kW |
Press size
Bale minimum diameter | 762 mm and 914.4 mm | 17 % less or 152.4 mm |
Bale maximum diameter | 1829 mm and 1524 mm | 17 % more or 305 mm |
Bale maximum weight | 997.9 kg and 703.1 kg | 30 % more or 294.8 kg |
Packaging device
Twine coils volume | 8 and 6 | 25 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Compression chamber
Belt width | 17.8 cm and 17.8 cm |
Baler
Overall width | 2.2 m and 2 m |
Tine to tine width | 1.5 m and 1.5 m |