- Home/
- Comparison/
- Square Baler/
- Challenger LB34B vs. Massey Ferguson MF 190
Challenger LB34B vs. Massey Ferguson MF 190
4 reasons to buy Challenger LB34B:
Sizes
Tractor mechanism required power of PTO | 89.5 kW and 90 kW | 1 % less or 0.5 kW |
Ram
Strokes per minute | 47 and 25.4 | 46 % more or 21.6 |
Packaging device
Twine coils volume | 30 and 24 | 20 % more or 6 |
Baler
Tines number | 128 and 120 | 6 % more or 8 |
2 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 190:
Press size
Bale height | 1200 mm and 875 mm | 27 % more or 325 mm |
Bale width | 1280 mm and 1200 mm | 6 % more or 80 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 9400 mm and 8900 mm |
Overall width | 3280 mm and 3190 mm |
Headroom | 3310 mm and 3680 mm |
Weight | 9097.7 kg and 8440 kg |
Ram
Length of stroke | 29.1 inch and 780mm |
Type of bearing | 4 sealed tapered roller bearings, 2 sealed ball bearings and sealed conical roller and ball |
Packaging device
System type | Six double knots and double knot, twisted twine, polypropylene or sisal |
Delivery chamber
Packer type | Fork Type with 6 teeth with firm surface and 6 tines fork-type |
Baler
Overall width | 3 m and 2.5 m |
Tine to tine width | 2 m and 2.1 m |
Type of lifting | Hydraulic and hydraulic cylinder |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3280 mm | 2. Overall width | 3190 mm |
3. Headroom | 3310 mm | 3. Headroom | 3680 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 9400 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 8900 mm |