- Home/
- Comparison/
- Square Baler/
- Challenger RB463A Auto Looping vs. Hesston 956
Challenger RB463A Auto Looping vs. Hesston 956
3 reasons to buy Challenger RB463A Auto Looping:
Sizes
| Tractor mechanism required power of PTO | 48.5 kW and 52.2 kW | 7 % less or 3.7 kW |
Press size
| Bale minimum weight | 745.7 kg and 998 kg | 25 % less or 252.3 kg |
Baler
| Tines number | 96 and 60 dual | 37 % more or 36 |
2 reasons to buy Hesston 956:
Press size
| Bale width | 1562 mm and 1182 mm | 24 % more or 380 mm |
Compression chamber
| Belts number | 8 Laced and 6 Laced, wedge clamp | 25 % more or 2 Laced |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3768 mm and 3937 mm |
| Overall width | 2604 mm and 2985 mm |
| Headroom | 2921 mm and 2921 mm |
| Weight | 2776 kg and 3057 kg |
Press size
| Bale minimum diameter | 762 mm and 762 mm |
| Bale maximum diameter | 1829 mm and 1829 mm |
Packaging device
| System type | Automatic, electrically driven and Manual, Tractor, hydraulically driven |
| Twine coils volume | 8 and 8 |
Compression chamber
| Belt width | 17.8 cm and 17.8 cm |
Baler
| Number of rods | 4 and 4 |
| Overall width | 2 m and 2.3 m |
| Tine to tine width | 1.5 m and 1.9 m |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3768 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3937 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2604 mm | 2. Overall width | 2985 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 2921 mm | 3. Headroom | 2921 mm |