- Home/
- Comparison/
- Square Baler/
- Challenger RB463A Auto Looping vs. Massey Ferguson 1734
Challenger RB463A Auto Looping vs. Massey Ferguson 1734
6 reasons to buy Challenger RB463A Auto Looping:
Press size
| Bale maximum diameter | 1829 mm and 1321 mm | 28 % more or 508 mm |
| Bale width | 1182 mm and 991 mm | 16 % more or 191 mm |
Packaging device
| Twine coils volume | 8 and 2 | 75 % more or 6 |
Compression chamber
| Belts number | 6 Laced, wedge clamp and 5 Laced, Mini Grip | 17 % more or 1 Laced, |
Baler
| Tines number | 96 and 42 | 56 % more or 54 |
| Number of rods | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
2 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson 1734:
Sizes
| Tractor mechanism required power of PTO | 22.4 kW and 48.5 kW | 54 % less or 26.1 kW |
Press size
| Bale minimum weight | 249.5 kg and 745.7 kg | 67 % less or 496.2 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3768 mm and 3353 mm |
| Overall width | 2604 mm and 1892 mm |
| Headroom | 2921 mm and 2134 mm |
| Weight | 2776 kg and 1261 kg |
Press size
| Bale minimum diameter | 762 mm and 762 mm |
Packaging device
| System type | Automatic, electrically driven and Manual - Electric Drive |
Compression chamber
| Belt width | 17.8 cm and 12.2 cm |
Baler
| Overall width | 2 m and 0.99 m |
| Tine to tine width | 1.5 m and 0.86 m |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3768 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3353 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2604 mm | 2. Overall width | 1892 mm |
| 3. Headroom | 2921 mm | 3. Headroom | 2134 mm |