- Home/
- Comparison/
- Square Baler/
- Challenger RB563 vs. Case IH RB464
Challenger RB563 vs. Case IH RB464
7 reasons to buy Challenger RB563:
Press size
| Bale width | 1562 mm and 1143 mm | 27 % more or 419 mm |
| Bale minimum diameter | 762 mm and 914.4 mm | 17 % less or 152.4 mm |
| Bale maximum diameter | 1829 mm and 1828.8 mm | 0 % more or 0.2 mm |
| Bale maximum weight | 1088.6 kg and 748.4 kg | 31 % more or 340.2 kg |
Packaging device
| Twine coils volume | 8 and 6 | 25 % more or 2 |
Compression chamber
| Belts number | 8 Laced, wedge clamp and 6 | 25 % more or 2 Laced, |
Baler
| Tines number | 120 and 96 | 20 % more or 24 |
1 reasons to buy Case IH RB464:
Press size
| Bale minimum weight | 181.4 kg and 997.9 kg | 82 % less or 816.5 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Tractor mechanism required power of PTO | 52.2 kW and 52.2 kW |
Compression chamber
| Belt width | 17.8 cm and 17.8 cm |
Baler
| Overall width | 2.3 m and 1.9 m |
| Tine to tine width | 1.9 m and 1.5 m |
| Number of rods | 4 and 4 |
Images