- Home/
- Comparison/
- Square Baler/
- John Deere 558 vs. Challenger RB463A Auto Looping
John Deere 558 vs. Challenger RB463A Auto Looping
4 reasons to buy John Deere 558:
Sizes
Tractor mechanism required power of PTO | 41 kW and 48.5 kW | 15 % less or 7.5 kW |
Press size
Bale width | 1570 mm and 1182 mm | 25 % more or 388 mm |
Bale minimum weight | 658 kg and 745.7 kg | 12 % less or 87.7 kg |
Compression chamber
Belts number | 8 and 6 Laced, wedge clamp | 25 % more or 2 |
4 reasons to buy Challenger RB463A Auto Looping:
Press size
Bale minimum diameter | 762 mm and 890 mm | 14 % less or 128 mm |
Bale maximum diameter | 1829 mm and 1520 mm | 17 % more or 309 mm |
Bale maximum weight | 997.9 kg and 794 kg | 20 % more or 203.9 kg |
Packaging device
Twine coils volume | 8 and 6 | 25 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 3610 mm and 3768 mm |
Overall width | 2670 mm and 2604 mm |
Headroom | 2600 mm and 2921 mm |
Weight | 1955 kg and 2776 kg |
Packaging device
System type | Electric and Automatic, electrically driven |
Compression chamber
Belt width | 18 cm and 17.8 cm |
Baler
Tine to tine width | 1.6 m and 1.5 m |
Number of rods | 4 and 4 |
Tines number | 96 and 96 |
Overall width | 1.8 m and 2 m |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 2670 mm | 2. Overall width | 2604 mm |
3. Headroom | 2600 mm | 3. Headroom | 2921 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 3610 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3768 mm |