- Home/
- Comparison/
- Combine Harvester/
- Challenger 670 vs. Salford CX8050
Challenger 670 vs. Salford CX8050
2 reasons to buy Challenger 670:
Motor
| Power | 261 kW and 243.1 kW | 7 % more or 17.9 kW |
Grain reception and processing
| Grain tank volume | 10571.7 l. and 9000 l. | 15 % more or 1571.7 l. |
3 reasons to buy Salford CX8050:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 12870 kg and 14333.5 kg | 10 % less or 1463.5 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 750 l. and 605.7 l. | 19 % more or 144.3 l. |
Grain reception and processing
| Unloading rate | 110 l/sec and 88.1 l/sec | 20 % more or 21.9 l/sec |
Neutral reasons:
Threshing device
| Rotor diameter | 700 mm and 750 mm |
| Rotor length | 3556 mm and 1300 mm |
| Concave zone | 1.4 m2 and 0.98 m2 |
Purifying system
| Total purification area | 5.4 m2 and 5.4 m2 |
Operation
| Transmission type | 4-speed hydrostatic and hydrostatic |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2100 rev / min |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Iveco |
| Model | C9 8.8L and Cursor 9 |
Images
