- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Al-Ghazi 640 vs. McCormick CX95
Al-Ghazi 640 vs. McCormick CX95
1 reasons to buy Al-Ghazi 640:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2500 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 12 % more or 300 rev |
8 reasons to buy McCormick CX95:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 54 l. | 65 % more or 101 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 1650 kg | 57 % more or 2225 kg |
Motor
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.6 l. | 18 % more or 0.8 l. |
| Full power | 67.1 kW and 55.9 kW | 17 % more or 11.2 kW |
| Maximum torque | 386 Nm and 249 Nm | 35 % more or 137 Nm |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 24.8 l/min | 59 % more or 35.2 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 2 | 92 % more or 22 |
Neutral reasons:
Operation
| Working weight | 2070 kg and 3285 kg |
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 7.50-16 and 10.00-16 |
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 16.9/14-30 and 16.9R34 |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Gearbox with constant mesh gears and Powershift / power drive |
Images