- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Case IH Farmall 65C vs. McCormick CX75
Case IH Farmall 65C vs. McCormick CX75
2 reasons to buy Case IH Farmall 65C:
Motor
Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 76.5 l/min and 60 l/min | 22 % more or 16.5 l/min |
7 reasons to buy McCormick CX75:
Operation
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 2040 kg and 1796.2 kg | 12 % more or 243.8 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 75 l. | 52 % more or 80 l. |
Motor
Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.2 l. | 27 % more or 1.2 l. |
Full power | 54.4 kW and 47.7 kW | 12 % more or 6.7 kW |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 24 and 16 | 33 % more or 8 |
Reverse gears number | 24 and 16 | 33 % more or 8 |
Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 30 km/h | 25 % more or 10 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 2365 mm and 2147 mm |
Height with rollover protection system | 2428 mm and 2540 mm |
Wheelbase | 2131 mm and 2237 mm |
Dimensional length | 3954 mm and 4209 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 2534.7 kg and 3285 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
Transmission type | 16 x 16 mechanically driven and Powershift / power drive |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 3954 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm |
2. Overall width | 2365 mm | 2. Overall width | 2147 mm |
3. Height with rollover protection system | 2428 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2131 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm |


