- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT525B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. Massey Ferguson MF 5445
Challenger MT525B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. Massey Ferguson MF 5445
3 reasons to buy Challenger MT525B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 270 l. and 130 l. | 52 % more or 140 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 6.6 l. and 4.4 l. | 33 % more or 2.2 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 110 l/min and 57 l/min | 48 % more or 53 l/min |
1 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 5445:
Operation
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 5000 kg and 4951 kg | 1 % more or 49 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height with rollover protection system | 2865 mm and 2750 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2827 mm and 2460 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4628 mm and 4210 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 5237.2 kg and 3605 kg |
Motor
| Model | C6.6 ACERT and 1104C-44T |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Perkins |
Hydraulic system
| Remote control valves number | 2 and 2 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | automatic transmission system with power gear shifting and gear shifting |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4628 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4210 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2865 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2750 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2827 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2460 mm |