- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT535B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. Massey Ferguson MF 465
Challenger MT535B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. Massey Ferguson MF 465
4 reasons to buy Challenger MT535B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 270 l. and 210 l. | 22 % more or 60 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 4951 kg and 3200 kg | 35 % more or 1751 kg |
Motor
| Displacement | 6.6 l. and 6 l. | 9 % more or 0.6 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 110 l/min and 17 l/min | 85 % more or 93 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4628 mm and 4560 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 2865 mm and 2640 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2827 mm and 2710 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 5420 kg and 3626 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Perkins |
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and natural aspiration |
| Model | C6.6 ACERT and 1006.6 |
| Power take mechanism power | 82 kW and 75.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 21000 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | automatic transmission system with power gear shifting and synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4628 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4560 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2865 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2640 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2827 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2710 mm |