- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT545B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. John Deere 5065E
Challenger MT545B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. John Deere 5065E
6 reasons to buy Challenger MT545B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 270 l. and 68 l. | 75 % more or 202 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 4951 kg and 1447 kg | 71 % more or 3504 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 6 and 3 | 50 % more or 3 |
Displacement | 6.6 l. and 2.9 l. | 56 % more or 3.7 l. |
Hydraulic system
Remote control valves number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Pump bandwidth | 110 l/min and 68.9 l/min | 37 % more or 41.1 l/min |
2 reasons to buy John Deere 5065E:
Sizes
Clearance | 457.2 mm and 392 mm | 14 % more or 65.2 mm |
Motor
Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 8 % more or 200 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 2827 mm and 2050 mm |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
Model | C6.6 ACERT and 3029 |
Power take mechanism power | 89.5 kW and 39.5 kW |
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
4. Wheelbase | 2827 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2050 mm |
5. Clearance | 392 mm | 5. Clearance | 457.2 mm |