- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT565B 2WD vs. McCormick CX95
Challenger MT565B 2WD vs. McCormick CX95
7 reasons to buy Challenger MT565B 2WD:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 370 l. and 155 l. | 58 % more or 215 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 70 l. and 34.5 l. | 51 % more or 35.5 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 6479 kg and 3875 kg | 40 % more or 2604 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Displacement | 6.6 l. and 4.4 l. | 33 % more or 2.2 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 180 l/min and 60 l/min | 67 % more or 120 l/min |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 40.2 km/h and 40 km/h | 0 % more or 0.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4842 mm and 4209 mm |
Overall width | 2060 mm and 2147 mm |
Height with rollover protection system | 3118 mm and 2540 mm |
Wheelbase | 2890 mm and 2237 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 6803.9 kg and 3285 kg |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and Turbocharger with wastegate |
Gear box
Transmission type | automatic transmission system with power gear shifting and Powershift / power drive |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4842 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm |
2. Overall width | 2060 mm | 2. Overall width | 2147 mm |
3. Height with rollover protection system | 3118 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2890 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm |