- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT575B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. John Deere 5075E
Challenger MT575B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive vs. John Deere 5075E
6 reasons to buy Challenger MT575B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 370 l. and 68 l. | 82 % more or 302 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 6479 kg and 1447 kg | 78 % more or 5032 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 6 and 3 | 50 % more or 3 |
Displacement | 6.6 l. and 2.9 l. | 56 % more or 3.7 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 180 l/min and 68.9 l/min | 62 % more or 111.1 l/min |
Remote control valves number | 4 and 1 | 75 % more or 3 |
2 reasons to buy John Deere 5075E:
Sizes
Clearance | 457.2 mm and 440 mm | 4 % more or 17.2 mm |
Motor
Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 8 % more or 200 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 2890 mm and 2050 mm |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and turbocharging |
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
Model | C6.6 ACERT and 3029 |
Power take mechanism power | 119.3 kW and 45.5 kW |
Images
Sizes
4. Wheelbase | 2890 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2050 mm |
5. Clearance | 440 mm | 5. Clearance | 457.2 mm |