- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT655B vs. McCormick CX75
Challenger MT655B vs. McCormick CX75
7 reasons to buy Challenger MT655B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 600 l. and 155 l. | 74 % more or 445 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 100 l. and 34.5 l. | 65 % more or 65.5 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 7078 kg and 2040 kg | 71 % more or 5038 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Displacement | 8.4 l. and 4.4 l. | 48 % more or 4.0 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 147 l/min and 60 l/min | 59 % more or 87 l/min |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 40.2 km/h and 40 km/h | 0 % more or 0.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5240 mm and 4209 mm |
| Overall width | 3000 mm and 2147 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 3140 mm and 2540 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3075 mm and 2237 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 8867.7 kg and 3285 kg |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Tech Star CVT and Powershift / power drive |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5240 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3000 mm | 2. Overall width | 2147 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 3140 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3075 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm |