- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT665B vs. Case IH Farmall 65C
Challenger MT665B vs. Case IH Farmall 65C
8 reasons to buy Challenger MT665B:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 600 l. and 75 l. | 87 % more or 525 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 7078 kg and 1796.2 kg | 75 % more or 5281.8 kg |
Generator current strength | 150 amperes and 120 amperes | 20 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Displacement | 8.4 l. and 3.2 l. | 62 % more or 5.2 l. |
Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 147 l/min and 76.5 l/min | 48 % more or 70.5 l/min |
Remote control valves number | 4 and 1 | 75 % more or 3 |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 40.2 km/h and 30 km/h | 25 % more or 10.2 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Case IH Farmall 65C:
Motor
Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 3075 mm and 2131 mm |
Dimensional length | 5240 mm and 3954 mm |
Overall width | 3000 mm and 2365 mm |
Height with rollover protection system | 3140 mm and 2428 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 8867.7 kg and 2534.7 kg |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) and Turbocharging with intercooler |
Power take mechanism power | 179 kW and 37.3 kW |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 18995 kPa |
Gear box
Transmission type | Tech Star CVT and 16 x 16 mechanically driven |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 5240 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3954 mm |
2. Overall width | 3000 mm | 2. Overall width | 2365 mm |
3. Height with rollover protection system | 3140 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2428 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3075 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2131 mm |


