- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT965B vs. John Deere 5525 narrow
Challenger MT965B vs. John Deere 5525 narrow
8 reasons to buy Challenger MT965B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1476 l. and 71.9 l. | 95 % more or 1404.1 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 8845 kg and 1530 kg | 83 % more or 7315 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Displacement | 18.1 l. and 4.5 l. | 75 % more or 13.6 l. |
| Full power | 380.3 kW and 67.9 kW | 82 % more or 312.4 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 164.7 l/min and 94.6 l/min | 43 % more or 70.1 l/min |
| Remote control valves number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
3 reasons to buy John Deere 5525 narrow:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 25 % more or 600 rev |
| Torque measured at | 1401 rev / min and 1400 rev / min | 0 % more or 1 rev |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 12 and 4 | 67 % more or 8 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 3949.7 mm and 2177 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow and turbocharging |
| Power take mechanism power | 316.9 kW and 56.7 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 19498.4 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | powershift transmission and 12 front / 12 rear gears PowrReverser |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 3949.7 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2177 mm |