- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT965B vs. John Deere 7420
Challenger MT965B vs. John Deere 7420
7 reasons to buy Challenger MT965B:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1476 l. and 250 l. | 83 % more or 1226 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 8845 kg and 4064 kg | 54 % more or 4781 kg |
Motor
Torque measured at | 1400 rev / min and 1398 rev / min | 0 % more or 2 rev |
Displacement | 18.1 l. and 6.8 l. | 62 % more or 11.3 l. |
Full power | 380.3 kW and 100.7 kW | 74 % more or 279.6 kW |
Hydraulic system
Remote control valves number | 4 and 2-4 | 50 % more or 4 |
Pump bandwidth | 164.7 l/min and 100.8 l/min | 39 % more or 63.9 l/min |
2 reasons to buy John Deere 7420:
Motor
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Gear box
Reverse gears number | 16 and 4 | 75 % more or 12 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 3949.7 mm and 2864 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 27215.5 kg and 5579 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
Aspiration | Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow and turbocharging |
Power take mechanism power | 316.9 kW and 86.9 kW |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 19994.8 kPa |
Gear box
Transmission type | powershift transmission and PowerQuad Plus |
Forward gears number | 16 and 16 |
Images
Sizes
4. Wheelbase | 3949.7 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2864 mm |