- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- John Deere 6603 vs. Challenger MT575B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive
John Deere 6603 vs. Challenger MT575B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive
1 reasons to buy John Deere 6603:
Motor
Displacement | 6.8 l. and 6.6 l. | 3 % more or 0.2 l. |
5 reasons to buy Challenger MT575B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 370 l. and 158 l. | 57 % more or 212 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 6479 kg and 2189.9 kg | 66 % more or 4289.1 kg |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 180 l/min and 62.8 l/min | 65 % more or 117.2 l/min |
Remote control valves number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Wheelbase | 2644 mm and 2890 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 3880 kg and 7302.8 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) |
Manufacturer | John Deere and Caterpillar |
Power take mechanism power | 72.3 kW and 119.3 kW |
Hydraulic system
Overflow valve pressure | 18960.6 kPa and 19994.8 kPa |
Gear box
Transmission type | TSS Synchronized crankshaft and automatic transmission system with power gear shifting |
Images
Sizes
4. Wheelbase | 2644 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2890 mm |


