- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX105 vs. Massey Ferguson 3625
McCormick CX105 vs. Massey Ferguson 3625
5 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 109.7 l. | 29 % more or 45.3 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 2501.6 kg | 35 % more or 1373.4 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 76.1 kW and 50.7 kW | 33 % more or 25.4 kW |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
1 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson 3625:
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 84.8 l/min and 60 l/min | 29 % more or 24.8 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2237 mm and 2080 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 3759 mm |
| Overall width | 2147 mm and 1930 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm and 2515 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3285 kg and 2300.2 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and turbocharging |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3759 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2147 mm | 2. Overall width | 1930 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2515 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2080 mm |