- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX105 vs. Massey Ferguson MF 420
McCormick CX105 vs. Massey Ferguson MF 420
8 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 48 l. | 69 % more or 107 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 1790 kg | 54 % more or 2085 kg |
Motor
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.3 l. | 25 % more or 1.1 l. |
| Full power | 76.1 kW and 48 kW | 37 % more or 28.1 kW |
| Maximum torque | 415 Nm and 270 Nm | 35 % more or 145 Nm |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 52.6 l/min | 12 % more or 7.4 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
2 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 420:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 42 l. and 34.5 l. | 18 % more or 7.5 l. |
| Turn radius | 3250 mm and 4400 mm | 26 % less or 1150 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 3510 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm and 2380 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2237 mm and 2060 mm |
Operation
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 16.9R34 and 13.6R28 |
| Working weight | 3285 kg and 2275 kg |
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 10.00-16 and 6.50-16 6PR |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and turbocharging |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and partial synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3510 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2380 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2060 mm |