- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX105 vs. Massey Ferguson MF 425
McCormick CX105 vs. Massey Ferguson MF 425
8 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 75 l. | 52 % more or 80 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 2500 kg | 35 % more or 1375 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 76.1 kW and 48.5 kW | 36 % more or 27.6 kW |
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 3.8 l. | 14 % more or 0.6 l. |
| Maximum torque | 415 Nm and 235 Nm | 43 % more or 180 Nm |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 17 l/min | 72 % more or 43 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 2 | 92 % more or 22 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2237 mm and 2140 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 3980 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm and 2580 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3285 kg and 2590 kg |
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 10.00-16 and 7.50-16 |
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 16.9R34 and 18.4-30 |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and natural aspiration |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and 8-speed with sliding spur gear |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3980 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2580 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2140 mm |