- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX105 vs. New Holland TM190
McCormick CX105 vs. New Holland TM190
2 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 17 | 29 % more or 7 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 6 | 75 % more or 18 |
6 reasons to buy New Holland TM190:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 397.8 l. and 155 l. | 61 % more or 242.8 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 100 l. and 34.5 l. | 65 % more or 65.5 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 7749.6 kg and 3875 kg | 50 % more or 3874.6 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Displacement | 7.5 l. and 4.4 l. | 41 % more or 3.1 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 120 l/min and 60 l/min | 50 % more or 60 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm and 2881 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2237 mm and 2842 mm |
Operation
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 10.00-16 and 11x16 |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and Turbocharged engine with intermediate cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and Power Command powershift |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2881 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2842 mm |