- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX75 vs. Case IH Farmall 90
McCormick CX75 vs. Case IH Farmall 90
3 reasons to buy McCormick CX75:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 90 l. | 42 % more or 65 l. |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 12 | 50 % more or 12 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 12 | 50 % more or 12 |
5 reasons to buy Case IH Farmall 90:
Operation
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 2279.3 kg and 2040 kg | 10 % more or 239.3 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 62.6 kW and 54.4 kW | 13 % more or 8.2 kW |
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
| Displacement | 4.5 l. and 4.4 l. | 2 % more or 0.1 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 82.1 l/min and 60 l/min | 27 % more or 22.1 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm and 2568 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2237 mm and 2311 mm |
Operation
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 13.6R36 and 18.4 x 30 |
| Working weight | 3285 kg and 2886.2 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and 12x12 mechanically driven |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2568 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2311 mm |