- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX75 vs. Ursus 5712
McCormick CX75 vs. Ursus 5712
7 reasons to buy McCormick CX75:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 80 l. | 48 % more or 75 l. |
Motor
| Maximum torque | 294 Nm and 285 Nm | 3 % more or 9 Nm |
| Displacement | 4.4 l. and 4.1 l. | 7 % more or 0.3 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 60 l/min and 46.2 l/min | 23 % more or 13.8 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 2 | 92 % more or 22 |
| Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 23.7 km/h | 41 % more or 16.3 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Ursus 5712:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 44 l. and 34.5 l. | 22 % more or 9.5 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 2600 kg and 2040 kg | 22 % more or 560 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 64.1 kW and 54.4 kW | 15 % more or 9.7 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4209 mm and 3820 mm |
| Overall width | 2147 mm and 2010 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm and 2550 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2237 mm and 2300 mm |
Operation
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 7.50-16 and 12.4R24 |
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 13.6R36 and 16.9R30 |
| Working weight | 3285 kg and 3600 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and mechanical with sliding gear wheels |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3820 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2147 mm | 2. Overall width | 2010 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2550 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2300 mm |