- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- McCormick CX95 vs. John Deere 6100D Cab
McCormick CX95 vs. John Deere 6100D Cab
4 reasons to buy McCormick CX95:
Operation
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 3143.4 kg | 19 % more or 731.6 kg |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 9 | 62 % more or 15 |
| Forward gears number | 24 and 9 | 62 % more or 15 |
5 reasons to buy John Deere 6100D Cab:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 158 l. and 155 l. | 2 % more or 3 l. |
| Turn radius | 2133.6 mm and 4400 mm | 52 % less or 2266.4 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 73.7 kW and 67.1 kW | 9 % more or 6.6 kW |
| Displacement | 4.5 l. and 4.4 l. | 2 % more or 0.1 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 66.6 l/min and 60 l/min | 10 % more or 6.6 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2237 mm and 2350 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 3285 kg and 3600 kg |
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 10.00-16 and 10.00-16 6PR F2 |
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 16.9R34 and 18.4-34 8PR R1 |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharger with wastegate and turbocharging |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Powershift / power drive and Power Revers |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2350 mm |