- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- New Holland T5050 vs. McCormick CX105
New Holland T5050 vs. McCormick CX105
4 reasons to buy New Holland T5050:
Operation
Turn radius | 4050 mm and 4400 mm | 8 % less or 350 mm |
Motor
Displacement | 4.5 l. and 4.4 l. | 2 % more or 0.1 l. |
Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 79.5 l/min and 60 l/min | 25 % more or 19.5 l/min |
6 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 126.8 l. | 18 % more or 28.2 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 2605 kg | 33 % more or 1270 kg |
Motor
Full power | 76.1 kW and 70.8 kW | 7 % more or 5.3 kW |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 24 and 12 | 50 % more or 12 |
Reverse gears number | 24 and 12 | 50 % more or 12 |
Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 30 km/h | 25 % more or 10 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 4085 mm and 4209 mm |
Height with rollover protection system | 2766 mm and 2540 mm |
Wheelbase | 2342 mm and 2237 mm |
Operation
Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 18.4x30 and 16.9R34 |
Motor
Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and Turbocharger with wastegate |
Gear box
Transmission type | 12x12 mechanically driven and Powershift / power drive |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 4085 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm |
3. Height with rollover protection system | 2766 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2342 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm |