- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- New Holland T6050 vs. Challenger MT535B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive
New Holland T6050 vs. Challenger MT535B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive
1 reasons to buy New Holland T6050:
Motor
| Displacement | 6.8 l. and 6.6 l. | 3 % more or 0.2 l. |
4 reasons to buy Challenger MT535B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 270 l. and 253.6 l. | 6 % more or 16.4 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 70 l. and 64.7 l. | 8 % more or 5.3 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 4951 kg and 3406 kg | 31 % more or 1545 kg |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 110 l/min and 102.6 l/min | 7 % more or 7.4 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height with rollover protection system | 2898 mm and 2865 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2652 mm and 2827 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
| Generator current strength | 120 amperes and 120 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) |
| Power take mechanism power | 70.8 kW and 82 kW |
Gear box
| Transmission type | 16x16 electrical switching and automatic transmission system with power gear shifting |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2652 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2827 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2898 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2865 mm |