- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- New Holland TB100 vs. Challenger MT525B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive
New Holland TB100 vs. Challenger MT525B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive
5 reasons to buy Challenger MT525B with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 270 l. and 140 l. | 48 % more or 130 l. |
| Cooling system fluid volume | 25.5 l. and 13 l. | 49 % more or 12.5 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 4951 kg and 1633 kg | 67 % more or 3318 kg |
Motor
| Displacement | 6.6 l. and 5 l. | 24 % more or 1.6 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 110 l/min and 67.4 l/min | 39 % more or 42.6 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3730 mm and 4628 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 2530 mm and 2865 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2310 mm and 2827 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 2755 kg and 5237.2 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with subsequent air cooling (by a cooling radiator) |
| Power take mechanism power | 59.7 kW and 74.6 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 17926.4 kPa and 19994.8 kPa |
| Remote control valves number | 2 and 2 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | 8x2 full mesh and automatic transmission system with power gear shifting |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2530 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2865 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2310 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2827 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 3730 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4628 mm |