- Home/
- Comparison/
- Two-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- New Holland TB110 lower-profile vs. McCormick CX105
New Holland TB110 lower-profile vs. McCormick CX105
3 reasons to buy New Holland TB110 lower-profile:
Motor
| Displacement | 5 l. and 4.4 l. | 12 % more or 0.6 l. |
| Full power | 80.5 kW and 76.1 kW | 5 % more or 4.4 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 70 l/min and 60 l/min | 14 % more or 10 l/min |
7 reasons to buy McCormick CX105:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 155 l. and 140.1 l. | 10 % more or 14.9 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3875 kg and 1633 kg | 58 % more or 2242 kg |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
| Maximum torque | 415 Nm and 337.6 Nm | 19 % more or 77.4 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 24 and 8 | 67 % more or 16 |
| Reverse gears number | 24 and 2 | 92 % more or 22 |
| Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 24.6 km/h | 38 % more or 15.4 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3340 mm and 4209 mm |
| Overall width | 2032 mm and 2147 mm |
| Height with rollover protection system | 2489 mm and 2540 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2286 mm and 2237 mm |
Operation
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 9.5x15 and 10.00-16 |
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 16.9x24 and 16.9R34 |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 4 and 4 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharger with wastegate |
Gear box
| Transmission type | full mesh and Powershift / power drive |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3340 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4209 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2032 mm | 2. Overall width | 2147 mm |
| 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2489 mm | 3. Height with rollover protection system | 2540 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2286 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2237 mm |