- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harrow/
- Brandt Contour Commander 40 vs. Bourgault 7200-84
Brandt Contour Commander 40 vs. Bourgault 7200-84
1 reasons to buy Brandt Contour Commander 40:
Sizes
| Mechanism required power of PTO per width | 2.2 kW and 3.7 kW | 41 % less or 1.5 kW |
1 reasons to buy Bourgault 7200-84:
Sizes
| Maximum weight | 6250.5 kg and 4243.4 kg | 32 % more or 2007.1 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wing tyres | 9.5L x 15 and 11Lx15FI |
| Main frame tyres | 16.5L x 16.1 and Standard 16.5L x 16.1 |
| Dimensional length | 11987.8 mm and 17806.4 mm |
| Transport width | 2819.4 mm and 4319 mm |
| Transport height | 3810 mm and 3352.8 mm |
Harrows
| Number of rods | 5 and 5 |
| Minimum tooth angle | 45 degrees and 45 degrees |
| Maximum tooth angle | 90 degrees and 80 degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 11987.8 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 17806.4 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 2819.4 mm | 2. Transport width | 4319 mm |
| 3. Transport height | 3810 mm | 3. Transport height | 3352.8 mm |