- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harrow/
- Brandt Contour Commander 50 vs. Brandt Contour Commander 52
Brandt Contour Commander 50 vs. Brandt Contour Commander 52
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Maximum weight | 4787.7 kg and 4787.7 kg |
| Transport width | 4014.2 mm and 2819.4 mm |
| Mechanism required power of PTO per width | 2.2 kW and 2.2 kW |
| Transport height | 3861.8 mm and 3810 mm |
| Main frame tyres | 16.5L x 16.1 and 16.5L x 16.1 |
| Wing tyres | 9.5L x 15 and 9.5L x 15 |
| Dimensional length | 13258.8 mm and 13868.4 mm |
Harrows
| Teeth adjusting | Manual (Standard) or Hydraulic (Optional) and Hydraulic (Standard) |
| Tooth size | 14.3 mm and 14.3 mm |
| Teeth arrangement | 61 mm and 61 mm |
| Section width | 10' and 4 @ 8' and 2 @ 10' |
| Number of rods | 5 and 5 |
| Contact pressure | 861.8 kg and 861.8 kg |
| Minimum tooth angle | 45 degrees and 45 degrees |
| Maximum tooth angle | 90 degrees and 90 degrees |
Chassis
| Operating width | 15.2 m and 15.8 m |
| Main beam measurements | 8" x 8", wall 3/16" and 8" x 8", wall 3/16" |
| Frame ground clearance - wing | 711.2 mm and 711.2 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 13258.8 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 13868.4 mm |
| 2. Transport width | 4014.2 mm | 2. Transport width | 2819.4 mm |
| 3. Transport height | 3861.8 mm | 3. Transport height | 3810 mm |