- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tractor with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive/
- Case IH Farmall 95C vs. John Deere 6715
Case IH Farmall 95C vs. John Deere 6715
3 reasons to buy Case IH Farmall 95C:
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 92.4 l/min and 66.2 l/min | 28 % more or 26.2 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
| Reverse gears number | 16 and 4 | 75 % more or 12 |
5 reasons to buy John Deere 6715:
Operation
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 2683 kg and 1796.2 kg | 33 % more or 886.8 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 93.2 kW and 70.8 kW | 24 % more or 22.4 kW |
| Torque measured at | 1600 rev / min and 1400 rev / min | 12 % more or 200 rev |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Displacement | 6.8 l. and 4.5 l. | 34 % more or 2.3 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2185 mm and 2650 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 2950.2 kg and 4250 kg |
Motor
| Power take mechanism power | 59.7 kW and 80.1 kW |
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2300 rev / min |
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and turbocharging |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 18995 kPa and 17236.9 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | 16 x 16 mechanically driven and Synchronized |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2185 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2650 mm |