- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tractor with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive/
- John Deere 7220 vs. Case IH Farmall 95C
John Deere 7220 vs. Case IH Farmall 95C
7 reasons to buy John Deere 7220:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 207 l. and 88 l. | 57 % more or 119 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3379 kg and 1796.2 kg | 47 % more or 1582.8 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Displacement | 6.8 l. and 4.5 l. | 34 % more or 2.3 l. |
| Full power | 82 kW and 70.8 kW | 14 % more or 11.2 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Remote control valves number | 2-4 and 1 | 50 % more or -1 |
| Pump bandwidth | 101.1 l/min and 92.4 l/min | 9 % more or 8.7 l/min |
1 reasons to buy Case IH Farmall 95C:
Motor
| Torque measured at | 1400 rev / min and 1300 rev / min | 7 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2650 mm and 2185 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 5446 kg and 2950.2 kg |
Motor
| Power take mechanism power | 72.5 kW and 59.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2300 rev / min |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with intercooler |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 18995 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | PowerQuad Plus and 16 x 16 mechanically driven |
| Forward gears number | 16 and 16 |
| Reverse gears number | 16 and 16 |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2650 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2185 mm |