- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tractor with Mechanical Front-Wheel Drive/
- John Deere 8210 vs. Case IH Farmall 95C
John Deere 8210 vs. Case IH Farmall 95C
7 reasons to buy John Deere 8210:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 512 l. and 88 l. | 83 % more or 424 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 4717 kg and 1796.2 kg | 62 % more or 2920.8 kg |
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 120 amperes | 14 % more or 20 amperes |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 4 | 33 % more or 2 |
| Displacement | 8.1 l. and 4.5 l. | 44 % more or 3.6 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 106 l/min and 92.4 l/min | 13 % more or 13.6 l/min |
| Remote control valves number | 3 and 1 | 67 % more or 2 |
3 reasons to buy Case IH Farmall 95C:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2300 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 40 km/h and 38.1 km/h | 5 % more or 1.9 km/h |
| Reverse gears number | 16 and 4 | 75 % more or 12 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2950 mm and 2185 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 8118.4 kg and 2950.2 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and Turbocharging with intercooler |
| Power take mechanism power | 138 kW and 59.7 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 19994.8 kPa and 18995 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | powershift and 16 x 16 mechanically driven |
| Forward gears number | 16 and 16 |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2950 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2185 mm |