- Home/
- Comparison/
- Swath Collector/
- Hesston 8250S vs. Massey Ferguson 9220
Hesston 8250S vs. Massey Ferguson 9220
3 reasons to buy Hesston 8250S:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 3628.7 kg and 3674.1 kg | 1 % less or 45.4 kg |
Motor
| Power | 82 kW and 63.4 kW | 23 % more or 18.6 kW |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 19.3 km/h and 17.7 km/h | 8 % more or 1.6 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson 9220:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 302.8 l. and 227.1 l. | 25 % more or 75.7 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Front wheel tread width | 3202 mm and 3241 mm |
| Rear wheel minimum track width | 2144 mm and 2144 mm |
| Rear wheel maximum track width | 3048 mm and 3048 mm |
| Length with head part | 6543 mm and 6543 mm |
| Overall width | 3706 mm and 3722 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3308 mm and 3324 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3556 mm |
Operation
| Front tyre size | 19.5Lx24 Grouser and 18.4 x 26 for turf |
| Rear tyre size | 14L-16.1 and 14.1 x 16.1 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | diesel 4B T3.9 and B3.3T |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with head part | 6543 mm | 1. Length with head part | 6543 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3706 mm | 2. Overall width | 3722 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3308 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3324 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3556 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3556 mm |