- Home/
- Comparison/
- Swath Collector/
- Hesston 8250S vs. Massey Ferguson 9635 Self-Propelling
Hesston 8250S vs. Massey Ferguson 9635 Self-Propelling
1 reasons to buy Hesston 8250S:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 3628.7 kg and 5071.2 kg | 28 % less or 1442.5 kg |
4 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson 9635 Self-Propelling:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 378.5 l. and 227.1 l. | 40 % more or 151.4 l. |
Motor
| Power | 141.7 kW and 82 kW | 42 % more or 59.7 kW |
| Displacement | 6.6 l. and 3.9 l. | 41 % more or 2.7 l. |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 24.1 km/h and 19.3 km/h | 20 % more or 4.8 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3556 mm |
| Rear wheel maximum track width | 3048 mm and 3048 mm |
| Front wheel tread width | 3202 mm and 3348 mm |
| Rear wheel minimum track width | 2144 mm and 2144 mm |
| Length with head part | 6543 mm and 6764 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3308 mm and 3388 mm |
Operation
| Front tyre size | 19.5Lx24 Grouser and 23.1 x 26 for turf |
| Rear tyre size | 14L-16.1 and 14L x 16.1 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Sisu |
| Model | diesel 4B T3.9 and 6.6 CTA |
Gear box
| Final drive type | Double chain and Direct transmission, planetary |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with head part | 6543 mm | 1. Length with head part | 6764 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3308 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3388 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3556 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3556 mm |