- Home/
- Comparison/
- Swath Collector/
- Hesston 9260 vs. MacDon M150
Hesston 9260 vs. MacDon M150
4 reasons to buy Hesston 9260:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 4277.4 kg and 4853.4 kg | 12 % less or 576.0 kg |
Motor
| Power | 138 kW and 96.9 kW | 30 % more or 41.1 kW |
| Power measured at | 2500 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 12 % more or 300 rev |
| Displacement | 5.9 l. and 4.5 l. | 24 % more or 1.4 l. |
3 reasons to buy MacDon M150:
Sizes
| Clearance | 1160 mm and 1034 mm | 11 % more or 126 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 367.2 l. and 302.8 l. | 18 % more or 64.4 l. |
| Generator current strength | 130 amperes and 95 amperes | 27 % more or 35 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3942 mm |
| Rear wheel minimum track width | 2144 mm and 2408 mm |
| Rear wheel maximum track width | 3048 mm and 3408 mm |
| Front wheel tread width | 3348 mm and 3410 mm |
Operation
| Front tyre size | 23.1 x 26 for turf and 18.4 x 26 |
| Rear tyre size | 14L - 16.1 and 10 x 16 |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Gear box
| Final drive type | Dual planetary drivedown and Planetary drivedown |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 3556 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3942 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 1034 mm | 5. Clearance | 1160 mm |