- Home/
- Comparison/
- Swath Collector/
- Massey Ferguson 9220 vs. Hesston 8550S
Massey Ferguson 9220 vs. Hesston 8550S
1 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson 9220:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 3674.1 kg and 4109.5 kg | 11 % less or 435.4 kg |
2 reasons to buy Hesston 8550S:
Motor
| Power | 123 kW and 63.4 kW | 48 % more or 59.6 kW |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 24.1 km/h and 17.7 km/h | 27 % more or 6.4 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Length with head part | 6543 mm and 6500 mm |
| Overall width | 3722 mm and 3868 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3324 mm and 3388 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3556 mm |
| Front wheel tread width | 3241 mm and 3274 mm |
| Rear wheel minimum track width | 2144 mm and 2144 mm |
| Rear wheel maximum track width | 3048 mm and 3048 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 302.8 l. and 302.8 l. |
| Front tyre size | 18.4 x 26 for turf and 23.1x26 for turf |
| Rear tyre size | 14.1 x 16.1 and 14L-16.1 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | B3.3T and diesel 6B T5.9 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with head part | 6543 mm | 1. Length with head part | 6500 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3722 mm | 2. Overall width | 3868 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3324 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3388 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3556 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3556 mm |