- Home/
- Comparison/
- Swath Collector/
- New Holland HW345 vs. MacDon M200
New Holland HW345 vs. MacDon M200
2 reasons to buy New Holland HW345:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 454.2 l. and 367.2 l. | 19 % more or 87.0 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 7.5 l. and 6.6 l. | 12 % more or 0.9 l. |
4 reasons to buy MacDon M200:
Sizes
| Clearance | 1160 mm and 922 mm | 21 % more or 238 mm |
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 4989.5 kg and 5579.2 kg | 11 % less or 589.7 kg |
Motor
| Power | 158.8 kW and 138.7 kW | 13 % more or 20.1 kW |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear wheel maximum track width | 3048 mm and 3408 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3485 mm and 3942 mm |
| Front wheel tread width | 3308 mm and 3410 mm |
| Rear wheel minimum track width | 2286 mm and 2408 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Generator current strength | 135 amperes and 135 amperes |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged engine with intermediate cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | New Holland and Caterpillar |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Hydrostatic 2 speed transmission and Hydro-Static Transmission |
| Final drive type | Planetary naves and Planetary drivedown |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 3485 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3942 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 922 mm | 5. Clearance | 1160 mm |