- Home/
- Comparison/
- General-Purpose Tractor/
- John Deere 5225 vs. John Deere 4720 CUT
John Deere 5225 vs. John Deere 4720 CUT
5 reasons to buy John Deere 5225:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 94.6 l. and 54.9 l. | 42 % more or 39.7 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 1530.4 kg and 1134 kg | 26 % more or 396.4 kg |
Motor
| Maximum torque | 214 Nm and 167.9 Nm | 22 % more or 46.1 Nm |
| Cylinders number | 5 and 4 | 20 % more or 1 |
| Displacement | 3 l. and 2.4 l. | 20 % more or 0.6 l. |
4 reasons to buy John Deere 4720 CUT:
Operation
| Turn radius | 2800 mm and 3100 mm | 10 % less or 300 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 43.3 kW and 41.8 kW | 3 % more or 1.5 kW |
| Torque measured at | 2400 rev / min and 1349 rev / min | 44 % more or 1051 rev |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 64.6 l/min and 52.6 l/min | 19 % more or 12.0 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2178 mm and 1816 mm |
Operation
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 8.3-24 4PR R1 and 8.00-16 R1 |
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 13.6-28 4PR R1 and 13.6-28 R1 |
Motor
| Power take mechanism power | 33.6 kW and 37.3 kW |
| Power measured at | 2400 rev / min and 2400 rev / min |
| Manufacturer | John Deere and John Deere |
| Model | 5030 and 4024T |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 19877.6 kPa and 17236.9 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | transmission with synchronizer and eHydro - 3 ranges |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2178 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1816 mm |