- Home/
- Comparison/
- General-Purpose Tractor/
- Massey Ferguson MF 410 vs. John Deere 4105
Massey Ferguson MF 410 vs. John Deere 4105
5 reasons to buy Massey Ferguson MF 410:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 48 l. and 39.7 l. | 17 % more or 8.3 l. |
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 1790 kg and 999 kg | 44 % more or 791 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 41 kW and 30.1 kW | 27 % more or 10.9 kW |
| Maximum torque | 222 Nm and 80.3 Nm | 64 % more or 141.7 Nm |
| Displacement | 3.3 l. and 1.5 l. | 55 % more or 1.8 l. |
4 reasons to buy John Deere 4105:
Operation
| Turn radius | 2890 mm and 3250 mm | 11 % less or 360 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2800 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 21 % more or 600 rev |
| Torque measured at | 2800 rev / min and 1400 rev / min | 50 % more or 1400 rev |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 56.2 l/min and 52.6 l/min | 6 % more or 3.6 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2060 mm and 1727 mm |
Operation
| Front tyres size 2wd / 4wd | 6.00-16 6PR and 10-16.5R4/8-16 R1 |
| Rear tyres size 2wd/4wd | 13.6-28 6PR and 17.5L-24 R4/14.9-24 |
Motor
| Aspiration | natural aspiration and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Perkins and Yanmar |
| Model | 1103C-33 and 3TNV84T-KJT |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 17500 kPa and 17236.9 kPa |
Gear box
| Transmission type | partial synchronizer and Hydrostatic 2 speed transmission |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2060 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1727 mm |