- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- AGCO GT65A vs. McCormick CX85-L
AGCO GT65A vs. McCormick CX85-L
2 reasons to buy AGCO GT65A:
Motor
Displacement | 4 l. and 3.3 l. | 17 % more or 0.7 l. |
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 86 l/min and 57 l/min | 34 % more or 29 l/min |
6 reasons to buy McCormick CX85-L:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 90 l. and 89.7 l. | 0 % more or 0.3 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 3400 kg and 1596.6 kg | 53 % more or 1803.4 kg |
Motor
Full power | 60.8 kW and 52.9 kW | 13 % more or 7.9 kW |
Hydraulic system
Remote control valves number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 30 and 20 | 33 % more or 10 |
Reverse gears number | 30 and 10 | 67 % more or 20 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Outer frame width | 1948 mm and 1876 mm |
Dimensional length | 3850 mm and 4020 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2692 mm and 2485 mm |
Wheelbase | 2184 mm and 2162 mm |
Operation
Three-point attachment type | Cat. II and Cat. 2 |
Working weight | 2880 kg and 3050 kg |
Motor
Aspiration | natural aspiration and turbocharging |
Gear box
Transmission type | transmission with synchronizer and mechanical reversing clutch |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 3850 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4020 mm |
2. Outer frame width | 1948 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1876 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2692 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2485 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2184 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2162 mm |