- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- AGCO GT75A vs. Challenger MT295B
AGCO GT75A vs. Challenger MT295B
7 reasons to buy AGCO GT75A:
Operation
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 1596.6 kg and 1399.8 kg | 12 % more or 196.8 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 89.7 l. and 50 l. | 44 % more or 39.7 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 61.9 kW and 38.9 kW | 37 % more or 23.0 kW |
| Displacement | 4 l. and 2.9 l. | 27 % more or 1.1 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 86 l/min and 61.3 l/min | 29 % more or 24.7 l/min |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 20 and 8 | 60 % more or 12 |
| Reverse gears number | 10 and 8 | 20 % more or 2 |
1 reasons to buy Challenger MT295B:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 15 % more or 400 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3850 mm and 3370 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2692 mm and 2290 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2184 mm and 1930 mm |
| Outer frame width | 1948 mm and 1660 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 2960 kg and 1690.1 kg |
| Three-point attachment type | Cat. II and Cat.I |
Motor
| Power take mechanism power | 55.2 kW and 30.6 kW |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and natural aspiration |
Gear box
| Transmission type | transmission with synchronizer and synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3850 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3370 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 1948 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1660 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2692 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2290 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2184 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1930 mm |