- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Case IH Maxxum 125 PRO vs. Challenger MT765B
Case IH Maxxum 125 PRO vs. Challenger MT765B
2 reasons to buy Case IH Maxxum 125 PRO:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 16 and 4 | 75 % more or 12 |
6 reasons to buy Challenger MT765B:
Operation
| Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 7257.5 kg and 4364 kg | 40 % more or 2893.5 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 446.7 l. and 250 l. | 44 % more or 196.7 l. |
| Generator current strength | 185 amperes and 120 amperes | 35 % more or 65 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 238.6 kW and 93.2 kW | 61 % more or 145.4 kW |
| Displacement | 8.8 l. and 6.8 l. | 23 % more or 2.0 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 164.7 l/min and 140 l/min | 15 % more or 24.7 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2661 mm and 2438 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2898 mm and 3444 mm |
Operation
| Three-point attachment type | Cat. II/IIIN and Standard cat.3 / 3H |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging/cooling at the outlet and Turbocharged engine with subsequent cooling of charging air by oncoming air flow |
| Power take mechanism power | 78.3 kW and 197.6 kW |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Gearbox with semi-powershift and powershift transmission |
| Forward gears number | 16 and 16 |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2898 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3444 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2661 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2438 mm |