- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT255 vs. McCormick CN45
Challenger MT255 vs. McCormick CN45
1 reasons to buy Challenger MT255:
Hydraulic system
Pump bandwidth | 37.5 l/min and 34.4 l/min | 8 % more or 3.1 l/min |
8 reasons to buy McCormick CN45:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 51 l. and 22.7 l. | 55 % more or 28.3 l. |
Three-point hitch load-carrying capacity at 24 inches | 1478 kg and 600.1 kg | 59 % more or 877.9 kg |
Motor
Cylinders number | 4 and 3 | 25 % more or 1 |
Displacement | 2.3 l. and 1.5 l. | 35 % more or 0.8 l. |
Full power | 30.6 kW and 21.2 kW | 31 % more or 9.4 kW |
Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2500 rev / min | 4 % more or 100 rev |
Gear box
Reverse gears number | 16 and 3 | 81 % more or 13 |
Forward gears number | 16 and 9 | 44 % more or 7 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Outer frame width | 1295.4 mm and 1303 mm |
Dimensional length | 2959.1 mm and 3193 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2014.7 mm and 2408 mm |
Wheelbase | 1639.8 mm and 1900 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 956.6 kg and 2297 kg |
Three-point attachment type | Cat. I and 1 |
Motor
Power take mechanism power | 18 kW and 28.3 kW |
Gear box
Transmission type | full mesh and transmission with synchronizer |
Images
Sizes
3. Height to cab upper part | 2014.7 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2408 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 1639.8 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1900 mm |
1. Dimensional length | 2959.1 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3193 mm |
2. Outer frame width | 1295.4 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1303 mm |