- Home/
- Comparison/
- Four-Wheel Drive Tractor/
- Challenger MT265B vs. Iseki TG5390
Challenger MT265B vs. Iseki TG5390
2 reasons to buy Challenger MT265B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 40.1 l. and 40 l. | 0 % more or 0.1 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 48.1 l/min and 34.4 l/min | 28 % more or 13.7 l/min |
4 reasons to buy Iseki TG5390:
Sizes
| Clearance | 420 mm and 356 mm | 15 % more or 64 mm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 12 and 8 | 33 % more or 4 |
| Reverse gears number | 12 and 8 | 33 % more or 4 |
| Maximum speed | 31.1 km/h and 30.3 km/h | 3 % more or 0.8 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 3070 mm and 3140 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2220 mm and 2570 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1770 mm and 1770 mm |
| Tyre size | (F)8-16 6 layers;(R)12.4-24 6 layers and Front 7-16, Rear 12.4-24 |
| Outer frame width | 1580 mm and 1500 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 1422.5 kg and 1310 kg |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2600 rev / min |
| Cylinders number | 3 and 3 |
| Displacement | 1.5 l. and 1.5 l. |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 3070 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3140 mm |
| 2. Outer frame width | 1580 mm | 2. Outer frame width | 1500 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2220 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2570 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 1770 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1770 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 356 mm | 5. Clearance | 420 mm |